<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It was 40 years ago&#8230; the first automatic chronograph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monochrome.nl/the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monochrome.nl/the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement</link>
	<description>Dedicated to Fine Watches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Because: Seiko 6139, The Other First Automatic Chronograph &#124; watchist.com</title>
		<link>http://www.monochrome.nl/the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-8667</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Because: Seiko 6139, The Other First Automatic Chronograph &#124; watchist.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monochrome.nl/?p=780#comment-8667</guid>
		<description>[...] been discussed here and elsewhere many times, the controversy surrounding the title of &#8216;first automatic chronograph&#8217; can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been discussed here and elsewhere many times, the controversy surrounding the title of &#8216;first automatic chronograph&#8217; can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray916MN</title>
		<link>http://www.monochrome.nl/the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray916MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monochrome.nl/?p=780#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>Seiko was likely first to produce an automatic chronograph and be first to market.

Based on Seiko serial numbers substantiated by watches in collector hands, Seiko appear to have started production of their 6139 automatic chronograph in February &#039;69 and by March had produced at least 4000 watches. Seiko had thousands of watches completed when the others only had prototype watches to show along with lots of marketing hype.

The Seiko 6139 is arguably a much more technically sophisticated watch than the others also. It was the first automatic chronograph to use a vertical clutch, it used column timing control and was an integrated chronograph. The Swiss didn&#039;t come up with a chronograph incorporating these technical features until 1987 when the F. Piguet 1185 movement was introduced.

Seiko never publicly hyped the 6139, as they were busy hyping the first quartz movement production watch, the Astron, which they introduced at Basel in 1969.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seiko was likely first to produce an automatic chronograph and be first to market.</p>
<p>Based on Seiko serial numbers substantiated by watches in collector hands, Seiko appear to have started production of their 6139 automatic chronograph in February &#8217;69 and by March had produced at least 4000 watches. Seiko had thousands of watches completed when the others only had prototype watches to show along with lots of marketing hype.</p>
<p>The Seiko 6139 is arguably a much more technically sophisticated watch than the others also. It was the first automatic chronograph to use a vertical clutch, it used column timing control and was an integrated chronograph. The Swiss didn&#8217;t come up with a chronograph incorporating these technical features until 1987 when the F. Piguet 1185 movement was introduced.</p>
<p>Seiko never publicly hyped the 6139, as they were busy hyping the first quartz movement production watch, the Astron, which they introduced at Basel in 1969.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mono</title>
		<link>http://www.monochrome.nl/the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>mono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monochrome.nl/?p=780#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>Thanx for the tip, the article by Jeff Stein is absolutely worth reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for the tip, the article by Jeff Stein is absolutely worth reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rolex 16233</title>
		<link>http://www.monochrome.nl/the-first-automatic-chronograph-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>rolex 16233</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monochrome.nl/?p=780#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>I can also recommend to read Project 99 – the race to develop the wolrd’s first automatic chronograph, a very intersting article by Jeffrey M. Stein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can also recommend to read Project 99 – the race to develop the wolrd’s first automatic chronograph, a very intersting article by Jeffrey M. Stein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

